Wednesday, May 11, 2016

The First Fifty Pages

Every writer learns early on the importance of the first fifty pages in a novel (or the first paragraph in a short story). Writing teachers and professional writers drum this into the student in every class, and add the comment to every manuscript they critique. And there's nothing wrong with this advice. The opening of any work of fiction is crucial to establishing the story and then the author as a worthwhile storyteller. But there is a downside to this advice.

For the decades I've been reading fiction in all genres, and especially mysteries, I've often been hooked by the opening paragraphs and then watched the story fade. This is more likely to happen in literary fiction than in crime fiction, but it is a problem in every genre. Sometimes this is called the problem of the sagging middle, or the ending that is more "talky" that anything else.

The emphasis on the opening pages or paragraphs stems from a very practical consideration. Editors read with the hope of finding something that will tell them the book (or story) isn't working and they can stop reading this one and move on to the next in the pile of mss filling their offices. The emphasis on the first fifty pages is basically a survival tool for editors. There is an assumption that if the writer can get the reader fifty pages into the story, he or she will want to keep reading to find out what happens. That isn't always true, but the belief is strong. I've fallen into the trap set by this dictum of the first fifty pages on both sides.

As an editor for The Larcom Review and The Larcom Press, and an occasional reader for contests, I looked for a sign that the author couldn't sustain the story over three hundred pages. And I looked for that sign in the first fifty. If a ms seemed promising I skipped ahead to page one hundred and then two hundred, to see if the writer could still keep my interest.

As a writer, I have found myself going over and over the first few chapters, to make sure they set the stage, establish character, and pose an enticing problem. But I know there is more. I have to avoid the trap of lavishing attention on the opening and skimping on the rest of the book.

To make sure I don't fall into the trap of focusing more attention on the beginning than the rest of the book I work on the ms in chunks, with a list of clues/details that have to be distributed throughout the story.


Despite my best efforts to avoid the trap of the first fifty pages, I fall into it just like every other writer. And then I work to climb out by giving as much attention to the rest of the book.

11 comments:

  1. Good observations. I'm going to try that skipping ahead thing and see if it works for me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let me know how it words for you. It's one way of making sure the story doesn't live and die in the opening pages.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So True, Susan!
    Thanks for the reminder.
    Good luck and God's blessings.
    PamT

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree regarding the importance of the "1st 50" but I don't know that it always works well for some writers, or even some readers. Personally, I like stories that build up slowly, sort of tease the reader's interest and draws them in. If the first few chapters make me curious, I'm hooked. On the other hand, I've seen stores that introduce and then murder a character within a few pages, and I'm left wondering why I should care of that character, or their death, at all. Sometimes additional background info pops up later, but by then I've lost interest. I guess I think a good balance across the entire book should be as important as the "1st 50" for most writers. It seems like the "1st 50" is primarily valued as a culling tool for editors, which can be unfortunate. Thank you for writing this blog post; very interesting topic.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Steven, you've expressed exactly what I was trying to get at. There's more to a great book than the first fifty pages. I too like a story that begins and builds, rather than trying to overwhelm the reader in the opening chapters. Thanks for adding to the discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Agree, and then there's the "inciting incident," which according to many, must be introduced quickly. The trick, I think, is not to agonize over those first fifty before writing the rest of the story. And to be careful that each scene starts as strong as the first one did. Then (yes, there's more--LOL), make sure the last fifty pages are as compelling as the first fifty. Nice when we can pull it all off.

    ReplyDelete
  7. All good advice, Jan. And not nearly as easy to do as to describe. Thanks for adding those comments on the inciting incident and the rest of the scenes. None of it is easy.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree with what's already been said. You need a narrative hook to catch the reader and draw him/her into the story. But it can't stop there.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree with what's already been said. You need a narrative hook to catch the reader and draw him/her into the story. But it can't stop there.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Exactly right, jacquie. Thanks for stopping by.

    ReplyDelete