Writers talk about laying out clues, spacing revelations
about character or events, or pacing surprises. All these discussions are
different ways of talking about structure, the underlying skeleton of a story
or novel. Arguments over when or how something should be done are really
disagreements in vocabulary. Almost no one disputes the basic organization of
fiction because this is the form that is instinctively satisfying for the
audience.
Teachers of writing have described the format in different
ways, and I, like many other writers, enjoy
reading about these and picking up small details that will help me in my own work. But almost all work through the basic three-act structure, with an inciting action, two plot points, and a climax. I have seen discussions based on a nine-act structure, but this is not significantly different from a three-act structure.
reading about these and picking up small details that will help me in my own work. But almost all work through the basic three-act structure, with an inciting action, two plot points, and a climax. I have seen discussions based on a nine-act structure, but this is not significantly different from a three-act structure.
I have never slavishly followed one of these outlines
because I rely almost entirely on instinct. Most readers know the feeling of
reading along and wondering what's going to happen next. They know something is
going to happen because they can sense it, perhaps in the foreshadowing or in
the rising tension or in hints coming from certain characters. The same
feeling arises while writing. I often find myself following a character along
in a scene and realizing something terrible has to happen in about two pages.
And something does because it's my job as a writer to make it happen.
The purpose of exploring and learning from discussions of
structure is in part to reinforce the writer's instinct that certain things
should happen to meet the expectations of the reader, and to guide the writer
on the path of the story set in motion. Any one of us can wander off track,
following an especially interesting character determined to have his or her
own story. If we have a basic story line and its structure in mind we are less likely to end up with an unwieldy story and undisciplined characters.
In addition to the graphics for story structures, some writers prefer to use a worksheet. A useful one allows the writer to keep track of the basic story progress, and to remind the writer where she is in the plot. If you know a certain key moment is approaching, you write to that point, bringing a tighter focus on the action of the story.
All of these materials or aids are only that. They are developed to help the writer tell a story, not to replace the work of identifying what is most compelling in the telling of the story.
The shape of the story is inherent in the characters and what they face and learn along the way. Bringing out their own stories and inner challenges will drive the discoveries and life-change events, and keep the reader turning pages to discover what happens next.