This is the time of year when those who are so inclined
start posting their reports of income for writers during the previous year. The
news is never good. Writers are used to that, and most of us don't expect a
report that tells us something at odds with our own experience. Some of us read
the bad news for comfort. "Aha! I'm not the only one barely breaking even
on this venture." Or we read for signs of hope. "Oh, look! Four
people out of 790,299 made money last year in this obscure category I've never
heard of before. Maybe I should try that." Or we're depressed and misery
loves company. "I knew it! We're all going down the tubes." But his
month came a report that knocked me off my usual tolerant perch.
According to Amazon, as reported in Claude Forthomme-Nougat's
blog, only 40 self-published authors can be considered a success. Only 40? Yup.
Because only forty writers have made money. Really? Yup. Only forty writers
have sold more than one million e-books in the last five years. Are you
hyperventilating yet?
My usual reaction to this kind of statement is, Are you
nuts? But what I really want to say is, Amazon has lost all perspective and so
has anyone else who believes this statistic is worth anything. That measure for
success is meaningless. It's the same as saying the best selling book in the
world is the Bible (which is actually correct), so all the rest of you guys
with a computer or typewriter or pen and paper might as well quit and find
something else to do.
Claude goes on to point out that most writers make enough to
live below the poverty level, which most of us already know. He also discusses
what this means for legacy publishers--they're losing market share. We know
that too, and so do they.
The problem with these kinds of reports is that they tap
into the competitive streak in most human beings, and that emotion blinds us to
what we would be taking away from such reports--nothing. Such reports lack
enough depth to be useful or informative. They are designed to get a little
quick attention, stir things up, and point out how important Amazon is. Okay.
We got that.
But for working writers, those striving to improve their
work and reach an audience, such reports are at best confusing and distracting
and at worst debilitating. They capture the ambitious new writer who wants to
know how to do the same, and can lead him or her down the proverbial rabbit
hole. This is a huge waste of time.
In my view such statistics are simply not worth taking
seriously. They have more to do with Amazon's business strategy and might be
better reserved for a private staff meeting. For new writers and established
writers trying to find a path through the changing world of publishing, I think
it is better to focus on what has always been the key to success--write a good
story or a good book. When it's done, take on the task of selling it, which can
be as arduous as writing it. And then keep writing. There are no shortcuts for
most of us, and good fortune or luck taps the shoulder of those who are ready.
To read the article, go to
http://claudenougat.blogspot.com/2016/02/only-40-self-published-authors-are.html#.VsNKt-keXww
Well said!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Edith. You and I both know how tough this business is, and these reports don't help anything. But they are sometimes entertaining.
ReplyDeleteI had a couple years, in the early days of digital publishing, in which I made a significant amount of money. These days sales are way down but so what? I love writing, I love being able to publish, and the fact that I get a check every month makes me happy. To me it isa win-win all the way around.
ReplyDeleteYou've done well with digital publishing, Kathleen, and I think you will continue to do so. I'm guessing that the vast numbers of people who want to write will shrink, and then we can go back to a regular world of books and publishing. Some of this is a fad.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Susan! You are right on all counts.
ReplyDeleteI'm rarely right on everything, so I'll savor this moment. Thanks for commenting.
ReplyDeleteTotally agree with you here, Susan. That "information" should have stayed in a marketing meeting at Amazon. It's useless for the rest of us.
ReplyDeleteI'm not aiming to be among the very top 40, but sure would like to make money from writing, instead of losing money!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Jan.
ReplyDeleteYes, Morgan, this is a very frustrating business, but I can't imagine doing anything else. Thanks for stopping by.
Thanks for the thoughtful article, Susan. I'm not making much money writing and confess I've certainly made more in the past. But money isn't my top priority. I want to write quality fiction in a variety of genres. Then I look for a publisher or publication. I know thanks to digital it's easier than ever to get work published and so it's a cattle call whenever an announcement is made for submissions, but it won't deter my efforts.
ReplyDeleteI have the same goals, Jacquie. It gets harder and harder, as you know, to find a good publisher, but we keep at it. Thanks for commenting.
ReplyDeleteDamned lies and statistics.
ReplyDelete