The publishing world continues to
get stranger and stranger. On LinkedIn, one thread is devoted to writers
arguing about whether or not they should give away their books for free, as a
teaser for a series, to get readers interested in their work overall, or just
as a way to get their name out there. This debate can get rather heated. On
some days, as the emails come pouring into my computer, I wonder if the
posters are getting any other writing done. Pricing e-books at $0.00 on Amazon
as a sales gimmick is a hot topic, and will remain so for quite a while.
The debate on LinkedIn fades in
comparison to the story of the Concord Free Press. Founded by Stona Fitch, the
press has published perhaps a dozen books in fiction, nonfiction, and poetry.
The press is supported by donations and grants, and all books are given free to
those who request them. Each requestor is asked to make a donation to the
charity of his or her choice, and let the press know what that is. The website
includes a page listing the donations. In total, the press has prompted charitable
giving of over $409,250. Fitch has succeeded in his goal: “we’re publishing
books that connect reading and giving like never before. And that’s enough for
us.”
I decided to give this a try and
placed an order for Zig Zag Wanderer, a story collection by Madison Smartt Bell. The
order page came up and I was asked to check off three questions about whether
or not I would make a donation to a charity I believed in or help a person in
need, and then pass along the book. I checked off all three boxes. I have
chosen the charity, The Gloucester Writers Center, and will also give them the
book when I’ve finished reading it.
I have mixed feelings about the
business plan of the Concord Free Press. As a reader and a socially conscious
citizen, I love the idea of linking books, charity, and raising awareness or
initiating discussion, but as a writer I cringe. Few of us in this world (and
the numbers dwindle as I write) can afford to work for free. What does it mean
for a professional writer, someone who takes the time to learn the craft, and
work her or his way up the ladder of the profession of writer (small magazines,
teaching, a first book, reviews and reviewing, and the rest of it) to give away
a book that may have taken two or three years to write?
For decades, if not centuries, the
lament of the writer has been that she is the last one to be paid. The
publisher gets the money and divvies it out. The printer always gets paid, for
obvious reasons, and so does the designer. The publisher gets paid because he
controls the money, and the editors and proofreaders usually get paid. Anyone
outside the office, and thus not in the publisher’s face every day, has a much
diminished chance of seeing any money. I know because as a freelance editor I
often had to make uncomfortable phone calls to a publisher insisting on
payment. In the 1980s several small publishing houses in the Boston area went
bankrupt, and the publisher walked away with what was left—the writers, freelancers, and staff got nothing. And now, it seems, we
begin at that stage of nothingness. (I'm feeling very Buddhist today.)
I admit to deep ambivalence here. I
admire what the Concord Free Press is doing, and I understand the passion
behind the debate on LinkedIn. But I wonder what all this means for writers who
have something to say, the skill to say it, and the determination to do so.
If someone else has insight into
this new world, I hope you will share it.
To learn more about the Concord Free Press, go to www.concordfreepress.com
To learn more about the Concord Free Press, go to www.concordfreepress.com
To learn more about the debate on LinkedIn go to LinkedIn, Books and Writers, For the sake of writers everywhere, please STOP this!
To learn more about the Gloucester Writers Center, go to gloucesterwriters.org
Susan,
ReplyDeleteI don't have much to say on this issue. I've given away books many times now, gifted them. However, I think writers should be paid for their efforts. Many people feel differently. They claim they write for "love" and "exposure." I think you can be paid for your work and love it as well. Would your plumber work for "love" or does he expect to be paid for his hard work? Why should authors be any different?
Like other creative people, it’s in the nature of writers to crave recognition. And money certainly compliments other forms of recognition. Few of us write for money alone, but I'm of the school that believes the worker should be paid.
ReplyDeleteI too think writers (also known as workers) should be paid. The Concord Free Press is indeed helping a lot of people, but in fact it is the writer who is making all this possible. And the writer gets nothing. If no one else was making anything, I might think differently, but the printer is getting paid, as well as others. That's obvious from the need for grants and donations to keep the CFP going.
ReplyDelete