I’ve been working on the second book in a new series that I’m
hoping my agent will sell. She has the first book, and I have an
eighty-thousand-word draft of the second. That’s a fairly long draft, but as I
read it over I can see I’ve missed a few things.
The story concerns one of the heroine’s cousins and his
wife. This is his second wife, and he has two children, a son by his first
wife, now deceased, and a daughter by his second wife. I’ve set up the story
with a reasonable number of suspects, developed and set out clues, explored the
characters so that readers can see their motivations if not their guilt, and
explored the setting and its influence on people’s behavior. In the end I have
what I think is a sound confrontation scene, a few surprises, and, of course,
changes in the protagonist’s life. What have I missed?
I missed the obvious. The teenage son is pivotal to the
crime and its aftermath, though he is never a suspect. He is mentioned by the
parents, the high school principal, the town librarian, and some other
characters. He comes up in conversation, and he triggers some significant
developments. So what have I missed? The protagonist never talks to him.
The protagonist is Felicity O’Brien, who owns a farm in a
small community in a very rural part of New England. She talks to just about
everyone, but somehow I managed to get her through this entire crime story
without ever having her talk to one of the key players. I’ve set out to rectify
the omission, with several scenes lined up at crucial points in the story.
I don’t think I’m the only one who falls into this trap.
Indeed, Agatha Christie used the omission of the obvious as a clue (and the
title) of one of her mysteries, Why Didn’t
They Ask Evans? (1934). I can’t speak for other writers, but I know that I sometimes
focus so closely on what’s happening on the page that I miss details (and
bigger things too) I should be including—location, time of day, day of the
week, name of the character I’m writing about, and a number of other details. Sir
Arthur Conan Doyle was famous for changing his character’s eye color.
Correcting these errors is the work of the near-final draft
and a good beta editor. But let’s face it. It is impossible to be both human
and a perfect writer. But it is possible to look for errors and omissions and
correct them. You can take this too far, and be obsessed about the text and
miss the story itself, but overall, every writer should want the text to be as
clean and as complete as possible.
When I began working on the scenes for the teenage son, I
discovered other parts of the story I could strengthen. One change suggested
others, and once again I followed them through the story. My task now is to
fill in the blanks I’ve created, and make sure every detail is present and
makes sense.
For a longer discussion of errors in books, you may enjoy
this article on editors who also make mistakes: http://penultimateword.com/editing-blogs/when-editors-make-mistakes/